Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sal's avatar

You’ve collapsed “not being the perfect anti-Zionist” into “Zionist,” as if political nuance is heresy.

Your indictment seems to rest on Mamdani’s statement that “Israel has the right to exist.” Stripped of context, yes, this phrase can signal ideological alignment with Zionism. But that’s only if we pretend language lives in a vacuum. Mamdani isn’t drafting the Likud charter—he’s just describing political reality. He also says Palestinians have a right to exist and a right to their own state - this contradicts Zionism.

You want a radical position, fine—but don’t mistake a sober recognition of geopolitical facts for ideological betrayal. The left doesn’t gain strength by selectively zooming in to one imperfect statement, stripping it away from context, and then drawing radical conclusions that contradict basically all the other things he has said but which is left out conveniently.

Expand full comment
Sarah Anne's avatar

He said he believes it has a right to exist as a state with equal rights. Zionism has Israel currently existing as an ethno-supremacist state. When pressed he offered his position, and did not cite belief that it has a right to exist as a solely Jewish state. So no, he isn't a zionist.

Expand full comment
123 more comments...

No posts